To our concept of fashion we invariably attach words like style and beauty and the history of admiring beauty is an undeniable aspect of the human experience. Certainly beauty began being put on a pedestal as far back as the first creations of art and mythology and our familiarity with Western civilization’s Goddess of Love and Beauty, Venus, attests to this. Though notions of beauty have varied and continue to vary from culture to culture, it is considered a virtue and worthy of attention. What is more recent and maybe peculiar to some, though not to all, is the beauty pageant and the public ceremony of beauty judgment.
The history of beauty pageantry as some kind of ceremonial and public event is more recently documented as a phenomenon of the late 1800’s, although the celebration of beauty has surely been part of community life for millenia. In the mid-1800’s the entertaining and enterprising P.T.Barnum held the first American beauty pageant which, though unsuccessful in its reception, opened the door to this kind of show for the increasingly media- and spectacle- oriented American public. By the 1880’s, aided by the availability of photography, the first Bathing Beauty Pageant was held on the East Coast and by 1921 Americans could behold the first Miss America Pageant. Though initially these pageants were not received very well, by World War II when young women were employed as beauty figures to sell war bonds, they gradually developed a wider following.
People, men and women alike, have always been able to distinguish among themselves who is deemed more or less attractive according to a cultural norm but the pageantry of beauty is interesting in our time period for the sometimes controversial factors involved and for the questions it raises in an inquisitive and introspective culture. Whether beauty contestants should be judged for more than their appearances, whether contestants have cosmetically enhanced their appearances, whether their public and/or private persona is considered worthy of public celebration, and even the question of how and why we should judge children in beauty pageants are controversies that surface from time to time. That humans experience so much through vision probably means that beauty pageants and judgments based largely on appearances for the public spectacle will remain part of our cultural experience. How we interpret this experience is what is interesting as is how our notions of beauty may change over time.
image: sculpture, Venus de Milo
image: painting, Birth of Venus, Sandro Botticelli
|
We apply our knowledge and enthusiasm in history to identify and select goods we believe will appeal to the most historically astute customer. Please browse through our online catalogue, or use our History Gift Ideas tool to assist you in finding the perfect historical product. | |||||||||||
Tags: 1800s, Ancient Replica Goddesses, Aphrodite of Melos Statue, art, Bathing Beauty Pageant 1921, beauty and culture, beauty history, beauty pageants, beauty world war 2, Birth of Venus, Bust of Aphrodite, ceremony, goddess, goddess of love, judgment of beauty, miss america, P.T. Barnum and beauty pageants, pageants history, Sandro Botticelli, society, venus, Venus de Milo, Venus goddess of beauty, Venus of Lespugue, Venus of Willendorf, WWII

Two particularly interesting periods in Greek history were the Archaic (between 750 B.C. and 500 B.C.) and the Classical periods (between about 500 B.C. and 336 B.C.), which comprise most of the era termed ‘Ancient Greece’ in the time line of western history. These periods of Greek history are notable because of the achievements in art, architecture, literature, and the socio-political developments that made Greek civilization unique. Prior to and during the Archaic period, formerly isolated Greek tribes began solidifying into more organized centers of government and population, forming what would become city-states, or ‘polis’, with their own authority but with strategic alliances defined among them.
Early in their evolution the city-states were frequently ruled by hereditary monarchies, called basileus, which then ceded to the oligarchic form of government, which was most typically a leadership of the wealthiest citizens. In oligarchies, political power was given to a council and only a select number of participants were designated by the constitution. If this form of government was overthrown, it was usually replaced by a tyranny, a form of usurping government through which wealthy leaders seized power unconstitutionally, although often with popular support. By the 6th century B.C., democracy as a form of government increased in popularity, though it remained rule by the few-only the free, male citizens of a state could vote to the exclusion of women, foreigners, and slaves.
After the power of Sparta was nearly extinguished by revolting Messeneans during the Messenean War, Sparta reformed its government implementing an authoritarian, military rule over its territory. Its strict militaristic government secured the rule of native Spartans while subjugating their conquests by a system of serfdom, where the subjects, called helots, would be essentially bound to a landowner’s property and forced to work the land in order to provide for themselves and their patrons. The military tradition of the Spartan, crucial to the strength of their government, was also remarkable. Spartans were very careful in creating a strong and able citizenry, which fueled the military. It was government policy to filter the weak elements from the society-a government body would be in charge of effectively deciding whether a child should live or die according to the physical strength it demonstrated at birth. Females were also affected by these policies and, though not raised to be part of the military, were raised to be physically fit, fairly independent members of society and strong representatives of their family units while their husbands and fathers were away on military duty.





